Organizational Behavior Case Analysis

Question: Write about theOrganizational Behaviorfor Case Analysis. Answer: Vroom-Yetton Model is a systematic approach for decision making process; this model allows you to make decision as a team. For this processes a leadership style is needed. Two decision that has been taken by manger are appropriate for group decision because for the first decision it is necessary to find out the possibilities that are convenient to the workers because sometimes it is very difficult to make the right decision to check the decision creditability and quality it is important to gather resources such as people information, time and others to ensure the decision usefulness. The second decision of implementing new equipment to increase the level of productivity is required to discuss because according to the model it has found that decision will last a great impact on performance of employee, a collaborative decision made as team will improve the quality of decision. It has analyzed after the discussion that they are still having problem for increasing productivity because t he equipment are not working in a proper manner (Rodriguez,2016). The manger had called a meeting to discuss the two defined decision, the manager act as a leader and wanted to have a quality decision which encourages the employees or increased the productivity. But the manager recognized that some of the workers were hesitating to share their views if manager stayed with workers, so manager had left the room to let them discuss openly. Manager left over the participant to give their best so the decision could be made on fair basis. And in the mean time she had attended a meeting with the manager of quality control department to find out the reasons that why there is quality problems exist when the new equipment has been implemented in the firm. The quality has become much cheaper as before it is due to the reason that new technology and its use is not easily understandable by the workers. The Participation of Workers Results into the following Decision The workers has explained that the new pay incentives are not in their favor and they are happy with the same standard for the pay set because The worker representing group clarified that their base pay had not stayed aware of expansion, and the higher motivator pay reestablished their real salary to its prior level. Further for the vacation purpose some of them said that they were agreed to have vacations on the same time as it happened and dont agree with who shall go first, some of them said that the vacation should be done on the basis of priority that who the one is efficient from making productivity should have vacation first and some of the said that vacation should be based on the seniority bases but at the end the said to the manger to resolve the issue as her own (storm, 2014). But it has been said in the end that the two decision discussion were not so impressive to her as at the end the participant its self are not sure about their decision. References Rodriguez, N. K. (2016). Women within Organizations under the View of Behavioral Decision-Making Theories. Strom, D. L., Sears, K. L., Kelly, K. M. (2014). Work engagement: The roles of organizational justice and leadership style in predicting engagement among employees.Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies,21(1), 71-82.